Every other report in Seller Central is about you. Brand analytics is about the market: what shoppers searched for, which listings they clicked, and which ones they bought.
It is available to brands enrolled in
Brand Registry, it costs nothing, and in most accounts nobody has ever opened it.
For a search term, the top clicked products and their share of clicks and of purchases. That is competitive intelligence Amazon gives to nobody else and sells to nobody at all.
Two things to do with it. First, find terms where you get clicks and not purchases: that gap is your listing or your price, not your ranking, and no amount of advertising fixes it. Second, find terms where a competitor takes most of the purchases and go and look at why their page is better.
The same idea from your own side: for each query, impressions, clicks, add to baskets and purchases, with your share of each.
It is the most direct answer to where the funnel breaks on a given term. Impressions without clicks is a title and a main image problem. Clicks without baskets is the page. Baskets without purchases is the price or the delivery promise.
The products people bought after viewing yours, and the ones they bought alongside it. The first is your real competitive set, which is often not the set you assumed.
The second is a bundling and advertising list. Products bought together are the obvious targets for sponsored placements on each other's pages, and sometimes for a bundle listing of their own.
How many customers came back, and how quickly. It is the only view of loyalty a marketplace seller gets, because you do not own the customer relationship.
For a consumable it is the number that decides whether the acquisition cost makes sense: paying above margin for a first order is a mistake on a one-off product and an investment on one people rebuy every six weeks. Nothing else in the console tells you which you have.
The report describing who bought is the one people find most interesting and act on worst. The samples behind it are often small, a lot of the fields are unreported, and a marketplace buyer is frequently not the person the product is for.
Use it to check an assumption, not to form one. If your whole creative direction assumed one audience and the data shows another, that is worth investigating properly rather than acting on directly.
Anything about a customer as a person you could contact. Amazon owns that relationship and brand analytics is aggregate by design, which is the standing argument for having somewhere of your own that people can buy from, as the store against marketplace question sets out.
The practical answer is to keep a channel where you do own it: a
store of your own is the only place a marketplace seller can hold an email address and a repeat customer rather than a share figure.
It also says nothing about why. It will show that a competitor takes most of the purchases on your best term and it will not say whether that is the price, the images, the reviews or the delivery promise. That still comes from opening their page and reading it against yours.
Once a month, three questions. Which terms give us clicks and no purchases. Which competitor is taking the purchases on our best term. And has repeat purchase moved.
Everything else is interesting. Those three change decisions, which is the difference.