Xcelerate Brands

+19.68% and $16.3K on 22.13% More Orders

More frequent purchases from a catalogue built for one and done buying.

Sports & Outdoor · June 2026 compared with July 2026, thirty days against thirty one · Published September 2026

Loading Sports & Outdoor banner

Five single unbranded mid value items on microcement in daylight, with a leafy plant in a speckled pot at the left edge.

The numbers

Ordered Product Sales

$99K

from $82.8K

+19.57%

Units Ordered

1238

from 1045

+18.47%

Order Items

1126

from 922

+22.13%

Avg Units per Order Item

1.1

from 1.13

-2.65%

Figures come from Amazon Seller Central Sales Dashboard snapshots for 1 to 30 June 2026 and 1 to 31 July 2026 at marketplace total across both fulfilment channels. Per day rates are calculated from those totals because July is one day longer than June. The work covered June 2026 compared with July 2026, thirty days against thirty one.

The challenge

June ran $82,788.25 ($82.8K) across 922 orders at $89.79, and the account had no organic floor. Rank on the head terms decayed whenever advertising paused, so every month restarted from zero and TACoS crept while total sales stayed flat. The second problem compounded it: there was no repeat purchase at all. The catalogue was merchandised for one considered transaction with nothing structured to bring a buyer back, so acquisition cost had to be recovered inside a single order every time. Fixing retention without fixing rank would have meant paying full price to acquire each customer we then hoped to keep. July traded a day longer, which flatters a total.

What we changed

  • Built a ranking push on the four terms with the strongest conversion history first, accepting a deliberately poor ACoS for six weeks to buy an organic floor that holds when spend pauses.
  • Set TACoS targets tied to organic rank per ASIN rather than managing ACoS in isolation, because a campaign can look efficient while the organic position underneath it quietly erodes.
  • Introduced a lower priced entry ASIN once rank was holding, accepting a smaller average order in exchange for a first purchase that can be followed rather than a browse that cannot.
  • Separated the entry line and the core range into their own campaigns, so the cheaper product could not absorb the budget the more valuable one had earned.
  • Structured Sponsored Display retargeting against the observed gap between first visit and purchase rather than a platform default window, so the reminder arrives while the decision is still open.

The outcome

  • Order count outgrew everything else, reaching 1,126 against 922, a rise of 22.13% where sales managed 19.68% and units 18.47%.
  • Revenue landed at $99,083.70, $16,295.45 ahead of June, growing more slowly than orders because the average order got smaller.
  • Order value slipped 1.99% to $88.00 and units per order from 1.13 to 1.10. That was the deliberate trade in launching an entry priced line.
  • July traded one day longer than June, putting the per day gain at 15.82% rather than 19.68%.
  • Daily order count moved from 30.7 to 36.3, roughly six more orders each day on a base of about a thousand a month.
  • Order count outgrowing revenue is the shape a ranking push and an entry line produce together. The Sales Dashboard confirms that shape without isolating which of the two did more.
Before

More case studies

View All

Want results like this for your brand?

Tell us where you are now and we will tell you what we would change first, before you commit to anything.