Xcelerate Brands

844 Orders to 2,208: $55.6K and 196.26%

January closed at 844 orders and $28,350.95 ($28.4K), and the account read as a

Baby & Kids · January 2026 compared with February 2026, thirty one days against twenty eight · Published September 2026

Loading Baby & Kids banner

844 Orders to 2,208: $55.6K and 196.26%: case study banner

The numbers

Ordered Product Sales

$83.9K

from $28.3K

+196.47%

Total Orders

2.2K

from 844

+160.66%

Units Ordered

3.5K

from 1.5K

+133.33%

Avg. Units per Order Item

1.6

from 1.85

-13.51%

Figures come from Amazon Seller Central Sales Dashboard snapshots for 1 to 31 January 2026 and 1 to 28 February 2026 at marketplace total across both fulfilment channels. Per day rates are calculated from those totals because February is three days shorter. The work covered January 2026 compared with February 2026, thirty one days against twenty eight.

The challenge

January closed at 844 orders and $28,350.95 ($28.4K), and the account read as a demand problem when it was an availability one. Listings cycled in and out of stranded and suppressed status, and each round trip cost organic rank that took weeks to rebuild, so the catalogue was losing ground faster than it recovered it. Advertising kept spending against terms the range could not reliably fulfil, buying clicks to pages that were intermittently unbuyable. Units per order stood at 1.85, so intent was never in question. Nothing could be funded until the listings stayed up, and February offered three fewer days to prove it.

What we changed

  • Paused advertising on every ASIN cycling out of stock before anything else, because continuing to buy clicks to intermittently unbuyable pages was funding the problem rather than the recovery.
  • Fixed the root cause behind the repeated stranded and suppressed cycles instead of reinstating listing by listing, since each round trip was costing rank that took far longer to rebuild than to lose.
  • Put FBM backup offers behind every FBA listing so a fulfilment gap downgrades the delivery promise instead of removing the offer, which keeps the ASIN live and its ranking history intact.
  • Released advertising back ASIN by ASIN as availability held for seven consecutive days, rather than switching the account back on at once and bidding into a conversion rate still recovering.
  • Corrected browse node placement across the range while rank was being rebuilt anyway, so the catalogue re entered the categories its buyers actually search rather than the node it was filed under at launch.

The outcome

  • February finished at $83,992.35, some $55,641.40 ahead of January and 196.26% up, in a window three days shorter.
  • Per day the difference is starker still: $914.55 became $2,999.73, which is a rise of 228.00% against 196.26% on the totals.
  • 2,208 orders came through against 844 and units 3,542 against 1,559, close to a tripling of the account's monthly order volume.
  • Units per order dropped from 1.85 to 1.60. The new orders were smaller than the old ones, so this was many more buyers rather than deeper baskets.
  • Per day the account went from 27.2 to 78.9, which is the single clearest measure of what changed.
  • Advertising stayed off until availability held for seven consecutive days, so none of this rests on spending into the recovery. What the source cannot show is the rank position regained along the way.
Before

More case studies

View All

Want results like this for your brand?

Tell us where you are now and we will tell you what we would change first, before you commit to anything.