Xcelerate Brands

86.42% Growth Added $47.4K Across Two Quarters

A range stopped meeting new buyers at its cheapest price.

Toys & Games · October 2025 compared with April 2026, six months apart and not consecutive · Published September 2026

Loading Toys & Games banner

Four unbranded upper tier items on white marble in daylight, with a leafy plant in a speckled ceramic pot at the left edge.

The numbers

Avg Sales per Order Item

$133.52

from $92.23

+44.77%

Ordered Product Sales

$102,279.00

from $54,866.21

+86.42%

Total Order Items

766

from 600

+27.67%

Avg Units per Order Item

1.04

from 1.12

-7.14%

Figures come from Amazon Seller Central Sales Dashboard snapshots for 1 to 31 October 2025 and 1 to 30 April 2026 at marketplace total across both fulfilment channels. The windows are six months apart and are not consecutive, so no monthly growth rate is claimed anywhere on this page. The work covered October 2025 compared with April 2026, six months apart and not consecutive.

The challenge

This comparison runs across two quarters rather than consecutive months, deliberately, because repositioning a catalogue is not a thirty day exercise. In October the account took $54,866.21 ($54.9K) from 600 orders at $92.23 and had become the price entry point of its category without ever choosing to be. Resellers were listing below the brand's own price, the cheapest SKU held all the indexing and advertising support, and every new buyer therefore met the range at its weakest point. Enforcement had to come first: repositioning a catalogue that is being undercut on its own detail pages is spending money to raise a price the market can already beat.

What we changed

  • Enforced minimum advertised price through Brand Registry and removed the reseller offers sitting below it, because no repositioning survives a catalogue being undercut on its own detail pages.
  • Withdrew advertising entirely from the lowest contribution entry lines, accepting a fall in order volume in exchange for the range no longer being introduced to new buyers at its weakest price.
  • Reindexed the upper tier ASINs against their own head terms instead of inheriting the entry line's keyword set, so the premium configurations had organic relevance to convert against.
  • Restructured the catalogue into explicit good, better and best families so the comparison happens inside our range rather than between our entry line and a competitor's mid tier.
  • Rebuilt Premium A+ around why the upper tiers cost more, then gave the whole thing two quarters before judging it, because rank on repositioned listings does not rebuild inside a month.

The outcome

  • Order value climbed 44.77% to $133.52. That is the lever this study is about, and the other movements follow from it.
  • Revenue reached $102,279.00 against the October window, ahead by $47,412.79, though most of that came from order value rather than from volume.
  • 766, orders came through an advance of 27.67%, while units managed only 17.98% to 794, as buyers moved toward single higher value purchases.
  • Units per order fell from 1.12 to 1.04, consistent with a range now selling one considered item where it used to sell several cheaper ones.
  • The two windows sit six months apart and are not consecutive. Seasonal difference between October and April is not controlled for, and nothing here should be read as a monthly growth rate.
  • Order value up 44.77% is what enforcement plus repositioning produces together across two quarters. Reseller offer counts and rank movement are not in the Sales Dashboard.
Before

More case studies

View All

Want results like this for your brand?

Tell us where you are now and we will tell you what we would change first, before you commit to anything.