Xcelerate Brands

Up 27.15% and $70.6K Going Into January

January is supposed to be the quiet month. This account grew through it.

Food & Beverage · December 2025 compared with January 2026, both thirty one days · Published September 2026

Loading Food & Beverage banner

Small unbranded everyday items grouped on honed travertine in daylight, with a leafy plant in a speckled pot at the left.

The numbers

Ordered Product Sales

$330,442.10

from $259,886.02

+27.15%

Total Order Items

11,472

from 8,910

+28.75%

Units Ordered

11,994

from 9,344

+28.36%

Avg Sales per Order Item

$28.80

from $29.17

-1.27%

Figures come from Amazon Seller Central Sales Dashboard snapshots for 1 to 31 December 2025 and 1 to 31 January 2026 at marketplace total across both fulfilment channels. Both windows are thirty one days, so the monthly and daily growth rates are the same and no adjustment is applied. The work covered December 2025 compared with January 2026, both thirty one days.

The challenge

December turned over $259,886.02 ($259.9K) across 8,910 orders, and the standing assumption was that January falls away, so advertising wound down from Boxing Day and restarted slowly. Nobody had tested it. The cost is not the lost January revenue, it is the organic rank surrendered during the cheapest impression window of the year and then repurchased at February rates, which is a transfer of money from this quarter to the next for nothing in return. Both months run thirty one days, so the assumption could finally be examined without a calendar argument. The safe move, wind down as usual, was the one that had never been priced.

What we changed

  • Held advertising budgets flat through the last week of December and the first of January, on the reasoning that competitor withdrawal makes that fortnight the cheapest impressions of the year.
  • Treated the window as rank acquisition rather than revenue, accepting worse ACoS through the period in exchange for organic positions that would otherwise have been rebought at February prices.
  • Moved proven December search terms into exact match before the January reset, defending rank earned during peak instead of surrendering and repurchasing it six weeks later.
  • Reallocated spend toward replenishment and everyday use terms that historically carry January, rather than continuing to fund seasonal queries that stopped converting on 26 December.
  • Recovered inventory placement across regions ahead of the restock window, so the delivery promise held while competitors were still clearing peak backlogs and losing the box on availability.

The outcome

  • January took 11,472 orders against December's 8,910 and 11,994 units against 9,344, advances of 28.75% and 28.36% in the month the category expects to shrink.
  • Revenue reached $330,442.10, an additional $70,556.08, reading as 27.15% against a December that had the holiday peak behind it.
  • Both windows run thirty one days, so monthly and daily rates are identical and no calendar adjustment applies to this comparison.
  • Order value slipped 1.27% to $28.80, placing almost all of the gain in order count rather than order size.
  • Daily sales went from $8,383.42 to $10,659.42, an additional $2,276 of trading every single day of the month.
  • Growing into January on equal windows is the result the budget decision was testing. Whether the organic rank held because of it is not something the Sales Dashboard can confirm.
Before

More case studies

View All

Want results like this for your brand?

Tell us where you are now and we will tell you what we would change first, before you commit to anything.